<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holy Saturday: Nature and Grace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmarsh.com/2007/04/07/holy-saturday-nature-and-grace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmarsh.com/2007/04/07/holy-saturday-nature-and-grace/</link>
	<description>Spirituality and Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Priest</title>
		<link>http://rmarsh.com/2007/04/07/holy-saturday-nature-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmarsh.com/2007/04/07/holy-saturday-nature-and-grace/#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>I have to ask rhetorically  - &quot;You mean von Balthasar got it right and Rahner was just plain confused! ?&quot;

Yes I&#039;m biassed ; being inundated with Eckhardt, de Chardin and way too much Evolutionary Hegelian-contaminated systematic theology - Rahner just becomes too panentheistic and I&#039;m sorry,but  Grace is a supernatural gift from God, not a hypernatural unfurling of self in respect of natural Divine revelation.
I&#039;m not clever enough to suggest that Rahner was wrong, but I know when von Balthasar speaks with truth - the Person of Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to ask rhetorically  &#8211; &#8220;You mean von Balthasar got it right and Rahner was just plain confused! ?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes I&#8217;m biassed ; being inundated with Eckhardt, de Chardin and way too much Evolutionary Hegelian-contaminated systematic theology &#8211; Rahner just becomes too panentheistic and I&#8217;m sorry,but  Grace is a supernatural gift from God, not a hypernatural unfurling of self in respect of natural Divine revelation.<br />
I&#8217;m not clever enough to suggest that Rahner was wrong, but I know when von Balthasar speaks with truth &#8211; the Person of Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eifion</title>
		<link>http://rmarsh.com/2007/04/07/holy-saturday-nature-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>Eifion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmarsh.com/2007/04/07/holy-saturday-nature-and-grace/#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>Love the Rahner. To me he is saying the same as Von Balthasar although coming at it from a differenct angle. I&#039;ve made a choice to avoid the overload of imagery and the wordiness of the Easter Vigil this year. I hope it leaves more room for what both of them are talking about. Thanks for sharing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the Rahner. To me he is saying the same as Von Balthasar although coming at it from a differenct angle. I&#8217;ve made a choice to avoid the overload of imagery and the wordiness of the Easter Vigil this year. I hope it leaves more room for what both of them are talking about. Thanks for sharing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

